;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;PTEL RUNNING NOTES TEXT FILE ;ptel_notes.txt ;ANDY FRIEDMAN & MARYAM MODJAZ ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;Changed from an html file located at this URL and directory: http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/%7Eoir/pairitel/ptel_notes.html /data/wdocs/oir/www-docs/pairitel/ptel_notes.html ;To an easier to update text file located at this URL and directory: http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/%7Eoir/pairitel/text/ptel_notes.txt /data/wdocs/oir/www-docs/pairitel/text/ptel_notes.txt The old html file now redirects you to the new text file http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/%7Eoir/pairitel/ptel_notes.html --> http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/%7Eoir/pairitel/text/ptel_notes.txt ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;TABLE OF CONTENTS - NOTE ENTRIES ;FOR EASIER CUT & PASTE TEXT SEARCHING IN THE WEB BROWSER ANDY, 1/30/07 ANDY, 1/18/07 ANDY, 11/17/06 MARYAM, 11/09/06 -- only SN Ib/c related things ANDY, 11/2/06 ANDY, 10/7/06 ANDY, 10/5/06 ANDY, 10/3/06 ANDY, 9/28/06 ANDY, 9/24/06 ANDY, 9/21/06 ANDY, 9/20/06 ANDY, 9/16/06 ANDY, 9/3/06 ANDY, 8/7/06 ANDY, 7/26/06 ANDY, 7/19/06 MARYAM, 07/17/06 ANDY, 6/27/06 ANDY, 6/19/06-6/26/06 ANDY, 6/13/06 ANDY, 5/29/06 ANDY, 5/4/06 MARYAM, 4/22/06 ANDY, 4/20/06 ANDY, 4/18/06 ANDY, 4/15/06 ANDY, 4/14/06 ANDY, 4/11/06 ANDY, 4/3/06 ANDY, 3/27/06 MARYAM, 3/24/06 MARYAM, 3/9/06 MARYAM, 2/15/06 MARYAM, 2/9/06 ANDY, 1/29/06 ANDY, 1/26/06 ANDY, 1/13/06 ANDY, 12/8/05 ANDY, 12/7/05 ANDY, 11/19/05 MARYAM, 11/11/05 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY 1/30/07 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- None of the SNTEMP observations requested on 1/18/07 have been made. Bad weather at Mt. Hopkins 1/19-1/23. SNTEMP are active. Should get back in touch with Josh. tsn2006E, SNTEMP.33, 9, 6 tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 9, 2 tsn2006X, SNTEMP.42, 2, 2 tsn2006ax, SNTEMP.43, 2, 2 tsn2006az, SNTEMP.44, 2, 2 tsn2006cp, SNTEMP.45, 4, 4 tsn2006cz, SNTEMP.46, 4, 4 I almost put these requests in, but will save these lines for later if additional observations are needed SNTEMP, tsn2006X, 185.72496, 15.809194, 1, 1.0, 50.0, 12.0, 12.0, 100, 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, 0.3, -1, 2, 20.0, bankit SNTEMP, tsn2006ax, 171.01442, -12.291444, 1, 1.0, 50.0, 12.0, 12.0, 100, 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, 0.3, -1, 2, 20.0, bankit SNTEMP, tsn2006az, 183.06117, 56.179389, 1, 1.0, 50.0, 12.0, 12.0, 100, 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, 0.3, -1, 2, 20.0, self SNTEMP, tsn2006E, 208.36883, 5.2061667, 1, 1.0, 50.0, 12.0, 12.0, 100, 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, 0.3, -1, 2, 20.0, self SNTEMP, tsn2005hf, 21.774875, 19.116806, 1, 1.0, 50.0, 12.0, 12.0, 100, 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, 0.3, -1, 2, 20.0, self ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY 1/18/07 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Added 7 new SNTEMP, to finish up objects from 05-06, which are all up now Each are scheduled for 2 x 1800sec observations. This is a beter strategy than adding 5 at a time, since I can make sure at least 1 good template is taken before potentially adding more, and it often takes at least 2 attempts to get one good one. tsn2006E, SNTEMP.33, 9, 6 tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 9, 2 tsn2006X, SNTEMP.42, 2, 2 tsn2006ax, SNTEMP.43, 2, 2 tsn2006az, SNTEMP.44, 2, 2 tsn2006cp, SNTEMP.45, 2, 2 tsn2006cz, SNTEMP.46, 2, 2 Each was added with the appropriate DKTYPE = self or bankit The first 5 are at priority 100, the last two at priority 20, since 06cp and 06cz have only 5 and 4 epochs on disk, respectively. After these are complete, I will focus on adding new Ia and Ib/c's and getting templates for the 06-07 SNe that have faded by not set. ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 11/17/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;data for current SNe ;successfully ran my archiving code (bug fixed on Tuesday, 11/14) ;new data and newly re-reduced data should be here: /pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR/rawdata/andy/my_archive/ ;;;SNTEMP tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 7, 0 ;SET - bad luck for this one ;;;SN Name, ObjID, Total Observations, Remaining Observations rsynced mosaics # of epochs (J,H,K) should be sn2006fo, SN.54, 50, 20 - 14,15,15 30 sn2006is, SN.55, 50, 29 - 8,8,8 21 sn2006jc, SN.56, 50, 28 - 4,4,4 22 sn2006ld, SN.58, 50, 40 - 7,7,7 10 sn2006le, SN.59, 50, 34 - 7,7,7 16 sn2006lf, SN.60, 50, 34 - 6,6,6 16 sn2006mq, SN.61, 50, 45 - 3,3,3 5 rsyncing data to my laptop to look at images... clearly real-time reductions are running behind. ??? status of re-reduced data. ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MARYAM, 11/9/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ONLY SN Ib/c related things: sn2006fo, SN.54 (SNIc): pretty useless; rysynced data all in all from Oct Oct data: - bad mosaicing ("poining problems" or wcs problems) - little S/N More data taken than rsynced changed cadence to every 50 hrs sn2006jc, SN.56 (SNIc): Only Nov 8 data successfully mosaiced, no mosaics for rest of 11 other epochs scpted to /pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR/rawdata/SN/58/mosaics since ANdy's my_archive has the wrong permissions 11/08/2006: SN very well visible in JHK sn2006lc, SN.57 (SNIc): Wrong coordinates for some reason, de-activated, useless sn2006ld, SN.58 (SNIb): Observed: Oct 29, 11/01,4, 7-9 Mosaics: Nov 8/9 in /pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR/rawdata/SN/58/mosaics 11/08/2006: SN visible ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 11/2/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SNTEMP, tsn2005hf, 21.774875, 19.116806, 1, 1.0, 50.0, 12.0, 12.0, 100, 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, 0.3, -1, 2, 20.0, self An object with the Name tsn2005hf appears to be in the DataBase already with ObjID SNTEMP.34 You have requested 2 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005hf' Your 2 observations of object 'tsn2005hf' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.34.6' still need templates 05hf, 06X, (06ac), 06ax, 06az, The latter 4 are all set as of 11/2/06, but 06az may be rising ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 10/7/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 10/5/2006 - pointing good, JHK bad - vertical streaks - like edge effects but in image center 10/7/2006 - JK bad, H DNE sn2006is, SN.55, scheduled for 10/8/06 ?redux sn2006fo, SN.54, 10/2/2006 - no data just project=SN.54.5was_done.fits 10/4/2006 - no data just project=SN.54.6was_done.fits ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 10/5/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Added sn2006is, SN.55, self Type Ia near max, but possibly still on the rise, optical mag ~16.2 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 10/3/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed bug in my archiving code. The normal archive is here: /pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR/rawdata/ My archive is here /pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR/rawdata/andy/my_archive The normal archive has bad edge data. My archive has bad edge data + any good edge data reduced after 8/10/06. I still need the bad edge data to test photometry for Ia's SN.26 sn2005eq Ia-pec SNTEMP.25 self SN.15 sn2005cf Ia SNTEMP.18 self So until I've run those tests, I will leave the data in /rawdata/ as it is. Eventually, I will overwrite it with the good edge newest reductions. The bad edge data will be backed up in 2 places. I have this backed up on 2 separate External HD's, one in my office, one at home. As of 8pm, my_archive is still downloading - will check images later tonight 10/2/06 ;;; SNTEMP ;;; Only 1 Active SNTEMP object tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 5, 2 ;;; tsn2005ke, SNTEMP.26, 9/25/2006 - No data - only proj_reduced.fits 9/27/2006 - J good, H ok (bad right edge), K ok tsn2005gj, SNTEMP.27, 9/25/2006 - No data - only proj_reduced.fits 9/27/2006 - wrong coords SN data had wrong coords to begin with - but only 7 epochs - unfortunately, this SN is not useful. Actual DEC: -00:33'13".9, (-0.553861) Observed DEC: +00:33'13".9 (+0.553861) too late tsn2006N, SNTEMP.31, 9/28/2006 - No data (although in obs DB) 9/29/2006 - JHK good 3# good templates - de-activated tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 9/28/2006 - No data (although in obs DB) 9/29/2006 - JHK bad - redo 9/30/2006 - JHK bad - redo 2 obs left - keep active ;;; SN ;;; sn2006gy, SN.52, no epochs observed sn2006gr, SN.53 9/25/2006 - Huge saturated foreground stars! J ok (streaks), H ok, K ok SN right on the diffraction spike of a bright star 9/26/2006 - J ok, star huge!, HK bad 9/27/2006 - J ok, star huge!, HK bad 9/28/2006 - J ok, star huge!, HK bad 9/29/2006 - JHK good 9/30/2006 - JHK good 10/02/2006 - JHK bad Type Ia The foreground star is just too bright - I think we're just going to have to can this one. De- activated sn2006fo, SN.54 9/27/2006 - JHK bad - teardrops, blurring 9/28/2006 - J good, H ok, K ok 9/29/2006 - JHK good 9/30/2006 - JK good, H bad 10/01/2006 - J DNE, HK bad Type Ic ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 9/28/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lyra online, ptel taking data, but Josh hasn't yet run archiving code. Ultimately, he has a working version of the archiving code, but he hasn't been running it every time. I can run my archiving code to grab data on days when he hasn't run his for whatever reason...this is better than scp'ing data over manually. ;SNTEMP tsn2005ke, SNTEMP.26, 7, 0 tsn2005gj, SNTEMP.27, 5, 0 tsn2006N, SNTEMP.31, 5, 3 tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 5, 4 tsn2005ke, SNTEMP.26, 9/19/2006 - JHK bad tsn2005gj, SNTEMP.27, 9/17/2006 - still wrong coords? J good, H good (still bad right edges), K ok 9/20/2006 - still wrong coords? H ?, JK DNE - redo 0 good templates (pointing still not correct) ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 9/24/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lyra is back online. Couldn't check images for past ~2 nights No new data since 9/17/06. Bad weather. ;;;SNTEMP tsn2005ke, SNTEMP.26, 7, 2 tsn2005gj, SNTEMP.27, 5, 2 tsn2006N, SNTEMP.31, 5, 4 tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 5, 5 tsn2006aj, SNTEMP.39, 7, 0 (De-activated) tsn2006aj, SNTEMP.39 - 9/17/06 - JK good bright star streaks, H good (bad edges on right) 9/16/06 - JK good bright star streaks, H good (bad edges on right) 9/14/06 - JHK good (see below) 9/12/06 - bad (see below) tsn2006aj de-activated. Now has 3 good templates I will try to make a new H band Bad pixel mask and send it to Josh before he starts re-reducing things in earnest. ;;;SN SN.52 - Added bright new sn2006gy. Untyped, but if its not a Ib/c/a, I will de-activate it. SN.53 - Added sn2006gr, it's a Ia ~-10 days before max, but its faint, at 18.3 mag in optical and rising. The first images could effectively serve as pre-discovery templates, but I don't know if it will be visible at maximum. ~19.3 in JHK if it rises 2 mag, it will be 17.3. We can see if it is detected in the next 10 days, and if not, de-activate it. There aren't many other candidate SNe right now, so it's worth the risk. Your new object with name 'sn2006gy' will have ObjID 'SN.52' You have requested 50 observations of the object with name 'sn2006gy' Your 50 observations of object 'sn2006gy' were added beginning with observation ID 'SN.52.1' An object with the Name sn2006gr appears to be in the DataBase already with ObjID SN.53 You have requested 50 observations of the object with name 'sn2006gr' Your 50 observations of object 'sn2006gr' were added beginning with observation ID 'SN.53.1' ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 9/21/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ...still very slow internet. takes ~30min to download even a single image. tsn2005eq, SNTEMP.25 - 9/17/06 - JK good, H DNE - 9/16/06 - J good, H good (bad edges on right), K ok - 9/12/06 data ok (see below) - 9/13/06 data bad (see below) Now 3# good templates. Deactivated. tsn2005ke, SNTEMP.26 - 9/16/06 - JHK teardrops on LHS of stars - redo 9/17/06 - JHK teardrops above stars,- redo 9/14/06 - bad (see below) 9/12/06 - bad (see below) Re-request 2 more observations: An object with the Name tsn2005ke appears to be in the DataBase already with ObjID SNTEMP.26 You have requested 2 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005ke' Your 2 observations of object 'tsn2005ke' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.26.6' tsn2005gj, SNTEMP.27 (9/20/06 notes) Dec problem fixed, new observations yet to be taken tsn2006N, SNTEMP.31, Observed 4/19/06 and 4/20/06 but SN still visible, no new data yet tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 5, 5 tsn2006aj, SNTEMP.39, 7, 1 Takes too long to download images, but Maryam is checking them anyway. In any case, since this SN is so important, it's ok to get multiple templates. ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 9/20/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- very slow internet....try tomorrow at Goddard. 6 SNTEMP still active tsn2005eq, SNTEMP.25, 5, 0 tsn2005ke, SNTEMP.26, 5, 0 tsn2005gj, SNTEMP.27, 5, 2 tsn2006N, SNTEMP.31, 5, 4 tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 5, 5 tsn2006aj, SNTEMP.39, 7, 1 sn2005gj, SNTEMP.27 pointing problems Actual DEC: -00:33'13".9, (-0.553861) Observed DEC: +00:33'13".9 either the coords were input wrong, or ptel is off Connected successfully to remote database You are going to alter the observations of object: tsn2005gj Number of matches to tsn2005gj in obs database: 2 Your old DEC was: 0.553861 the new DEC is: -0.553861 ERROR in handling of declinations -00 treated as +00 in reqirsn.pro Only affects -00, all other declinations had been handled correctly As such, this only affected sn2005gj. FIXED 9/20/06 WHAT ABOUT ACTUAL SN DATA? DOUBLE CHECK when I get access to a faster internet connection. ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 09/16/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PTEL up and running. SNTEMP data reduced for 9/12, 9/14, 9/15 Check images and de-activate SNTEMP with at least 1 good template. May reactivate later. New bad pixel masks 8.10.06 appear to have helped with the edge effects, but some still persist. 9/12 SNTEMP.21 - SN.21 - tsn2005ek - J good, center streaks, HK good. SNTEMP.25 - SN.26 - tsn2005eq - JH good, chip boundary streak, K ok, bad edges better, but not completely gone. SNTEMP.26 - SN.32 - tsn2005ke - JH ok, streaks, H ok - redo SNTEMP.39 - SN.44 - tsn2006aj - JHK bad - redo 9/13 just GRB data 9/14 SNTEMP.21 - SN.21 - tsn2005ek - JHK good, RHS edge effects SNTEMP.25 - SN.26 - tsn2005eq - J good, some oversubtraction, HK ok, washed out SNTEMP.26 - SN.32 - tsn2005ke - JHK ghosting effects above stars - redo SNTEMP.27 - SN.34 - tsn2005gj - ?pointing problems SNTEMP.28 - SN.35 - tsn2005ls - JHK good, bright star streak, some teardrop, but at least 1 good template SNTEMP.39 - SN.44 - tsn2005na - JHK good, bright star streaks, some warping of stars, but at least 1 good template now SNTEMP.40 - SN.38 - tsn2005na - J good, H good, but RHS bad edge effects, K good, at least 1 good template SNTEMP.41 - SN.48 - tsn2006bq - J good, but ?quadrant effects, HK good, at least 1 good template 9/15 Just POINTING.TWEAKS Overall SNTEMP.ID - SN.ID - name - status good templates SNTEMP.21 - SN.21 - tsn2005ek - deactivated 2# SNTEMP.25 - SN.26 - tsn2005eq - keep active 1* SNTEMP.26 - SN.32 - tsn2005ke - keep active 0 SNTEMP.39 - SN.44 - tsn2006aj - keep active 1 SNTEMP.27 - SN.34 - tsn2005gj - keep active 0 SNTEMP.28 - SN.35 - tsn2005ls - deactivated 1 SNTEMP.40 - SN.38 - tsn2005na - deactivated 1 SNTEMP.41 - SN.48 - tsn2006bq - deactivated 1 * - part of 1 good template, i.e. bad K band but JH ok # - some with bad K band, but at least 1 with JHK all acceptable Number of active objects in Project: 6 Name, ObjID, Total Observations, Remaining Observations tsn2005eq, SNTEMP.25, 5, 2 tsn2005ke, SNTEMP.26, 5, 2 tsn2005gj, SNTEMP.27, 5, 4 tsn2006N, SNTEMP.31, 5, 4 tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 5, 5 tsn2006aj, SNTEMP.39, 5, 2 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 09/4/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;New PTEL observing season ;Re-Activate old templates and add new templates ;try to get 1 good template before requesting more ;2 observations is good in order to get 1 template, 5 is too many Check SN with no good templates confirmed as of latest data census However, I expect to find some previously unknown good templates in my new archive These are ones that I did not know had been reduced because they were not archived Although 5 template requests previously was overkill, I am now re-activating some new templates which still have 5 obs remaining. I will leave this for now, but if the data are reduced in real time I can check to see if a good template is taken and then de-activate the object with however many obs are still remaining. SUMMARY Here is a summary of the active SNTEMP: select * from object where ProjID = "SNTEMP" and IsActive = "yes" SNTEMP.ID Proj IsActive ObjName RA DEC priority up # good templates SNTEMP.28 SNTEMP yes tsn2005ls 43.5665 42.7249 70 last 8 hours 0 SNTEMP.21 SNTEMP yes tsn2005ek 46.454 36.7696 80 last 6 hours 1~ partial SNTEMP.25 SNTEMP yes tsn2005eq 47.2055 -7.03325 100 last 5 hours 0 SNTEMP.26 SNTEMP yes tsn2005ke 53.7681 -24.9441 100 last 2-3 hours 0 SNTEMP.27 SNTEMP yes tsn2005gj 45.2998 0.553861 50 last 6 hours 0 SNTEMP.31 SNTEMP yes tsn2006N 92.1302 64.7236 30 last 4 hours 2~ partial SNTEMP.34 SNTEMP yes tsn2005hf 21.7749 19.1168 70 last 8 hours 0 SNTEMP.39 SNTEMP yes tsn2006aj 50.4155 16.8674 100 last 5-6 hours 0 SNTEMP.40 SNTEMP yes tsn2005na 105.403 14.1333 100 last 2 hours 0 SNTEMP.41 SNTEMP yes tsn2006bq 279.995 39.9824 70 first 6 hours 0 Number of active objects in Project: 10 Name, ObjID, Total Observations, Remaining Observations tsn2005ls, SNTEMP.28, 5, 5 tsn2005ek, SNTEMP.21, 5, 3 tsn2005eq, SNTEMP.25, 5, 5 tsn2005ke, SNTEMP.26, 5, 5 tsn2005gj, SNTEMP.27, 5, 5 tsn2006N, SNTEMP.31, 5, 4 tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 5, 5 tsn2006aj, SNTEMP.39, 5, 5 tsn2005na, SNTEMP.40, 2, 2 tsn2006bq, SNTEMP.41, 2, 2 some of them have 5 observations scheduled, left over from last semester, but we can deactivate them as soon as we see 1 good template, provided, reductions proceed in real time. ;;; sn2005el, SN.18, SNTEMP.24, Ia, - up last 3 hours ***Update: 4/6/06 ok some artifacts, esp. in K but OK 4/9/06 crap 4/17/06 crap 4/19/06 JH excellent! K ok (no bad edges - reduced in April w/ old BPM - must have picked a good skark) 2 good templates! Re-activated, You have requested 2 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005el' (oops, after checking images) De-activated ;;; ;;; sn2005ek, SN.21, SNTEMP.21, Ic - up last 6 hours ***Update: 7/23/06 JH ok, K crap ~1 good template, but keep Active to get at least one with K band acceptable Active: 5 scheduled obs, 3 remaining, priority 100 --> 80 ;;; ;;; sn2005eq, SN.26, SNTEMP.25, Ia - up last 5 hours No observed templates on lyra in my archive Re-activated: 5 scheduled obs, 5 remaining, priority 70 --> 100 ;;; ;;; sn2005hf, SN.28, SNTEMP.34, Ia - up last 8 hours No observed templates on lyra in my archive Active: 5 scheduled obs, 5 remaining, priority 100 --> 70 (0 good templates, but up 8 hours) ;;; ;;; sn2005ke, SN.32, SNTEMP.26, Ia - up last 2-3 hours No observed templates on lyra in my archive Re-activated: 5 scheduled obs, 5 remaining, priority 70 --> 100 ;;; ;;; sn2005gj, SN.34, SNTEMP.27, Ia-pec - up last 6 hours No observed templates on lyra in my archive only 3 mosaics at CfA, 11 in DB, so this one will have a lower priority template Re-activated: 5 scheduled obs, 5 remaining, priority 70 --> 50 ;;; ;;; sn2005ls, SN.25, SNTEMP.28 - up last 7 hours No observed templates on lyra in my archive Re-activated: 5 scheduled obs, 5 remaining, priority remains at 70 (0 good templates, but up 7 hours) ;;; ;;; sn2005na, SN.38, SNTEMP.40, - up last 2 hours Your new object with name 'tsn2005na' will have ObjID 'SNTEMP.40' You have requested 2 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005na' Your 2 observations of object 'tsn2005na' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.40.1' Active: 2 scheduled obs, 2 remain, priority 100 ;;; ;;; sn2006D, SN.39, SNTEMP.32, - set New data shown in my archive ***Update: 4/21/06 JHK excellent! (no bad edges in J, some in H, more in K) - SN not visible! 4/27/06 JHK excellent! (bad edges, encroching more in H, but normal enough in Jk) - SN not visible! 2 good templates! De-Activated ;;; ;;; sn2006E, SN.40, SNTEMP.33 - set (barely up 1st hour) New data shown in my archive ***Update: 4/21/06 - J good but SN still visible (use as data) 4/23/06 - J good but SN still visible (use as data) 4/25/06 - JHK crap 7/23/06 - JHK tons of artifacts De-activated: not up anyway ;;; ;;; sn2006N, SN.41, SNTEMP.31 - up last 4 hours New data shown in my archive ***Update: 4/17/06 - J ok, HK DNE 4/19/96 - JH excellent! K crappy, SN appears not to be visible, but hard to tell, embedded in galaxy 4/20/06 - JH, excellent! K crappy 4/21/06 - J ok, but lots of artifacts, H excellent, K crappy 4/25/06 - J complete crap, H ok, K bad 2~ good templates, but keep active to get some good K band teplates Re-Activated: 5 sched obs, 4 remain, priority 100 -> 30 (have almost 2 good templates) ;;; ;;; sn2006X, SN.42, SNTEMP.XX - set Can still look for third peak in JHK LC even w/o template ;;; ;;; sn2006ac, SN.43, SNTEMP.35 - set 5 late time data points w/ no SN might serve as templates No data in my lyra archive May reactivate later depending on quality of "templates" ;;; ;;; sn2006aj, SN.44, SNTEMP.39, (GRB.80, grb060218) - up last 5-6 hours Maryam Just created 5 obs sched, 5 remain, p 100 ;;; ;;; sn2006ax, SN.45, SNTEMP.XX - set sn2006az, SN.46, SNTEMP.XX - set ;;; ;;; sn2006bq, SN.48, SNTEMP.41 - up first 6 hours - worth making as a template Your new object with name 'tsn2006bq' will have ObjID 'SNTEMP.41' You have requested 2 observations of the object with name 'tsn2006bq' Your 2 observations of object 'tsn2006bq' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.41.1' priority 70 (up 6 hours) ;;; ;;; sn2006cp, SN.49, SNTEMP.XX - set - 5 epochs (not worth template anyway) sn2006cz, SN.50, SNTEMP.XX - set up ~1st hour - 4 epochs (not worth template) sn2006do, SN.51, SNTEMP.XX - up ~2 hours in middle - 0 epochs (not worth template) ;;; these already had at least 1 good template as of the latest census but I suspect more mosaics were reduced and I should find them now that they are properly archived ;;; sn2005iq, SN.31, SNTEMP.38, Ia, - up last 6 hours ***Update: looking again at these templates: Maryam looked at them before (some weren't reduced yet) 7/9/06 - JHK good 7/10/06 - J good, H washout, K washout 7/11/06 - JHK bad pointing, bad quality - confirm Maryam's notes on 7/17/06 7/12/06 - JH good, K bad 2~ good templates! De-Activated: ;;; ;;; sn2005eu, SN.27, SNTEMP.37, Ia, - up last 6-7 hours ***Update: looking again at these templates: Maryam looked at them before (some weren't reduced yet) 7/9/06 - JH good, K weird washout 7/10/06 - JHK ghost stars above, unusable 7/11/06 - JHK bad pointing, bad quality - confirm Maryam's notes on 7/17/06 7/12/06 - JH good, K bad 1~ good templates! ;;; ;;; sn2005hk, SN.30, SNTEMP.36, Ia - up 8 hours 7/9/06 - J good, HK washout 7/10/06 - J good, HK washout 7/11/06 - JHK bad pointing, bad quality - confirm Maryam's notes on 7/17/06 7/12/06 - JH good, K bad 2~ good templates! ;;; ;;; sn2005hg, SN.29, SNTEMP.6, Ib ***Update: New templates found in archive 6/18/06 - J ok, H good, K ok 6/19/06 - J ok, H good, K ok 6/20/06 - JHK good 6/21/06 - JH good K ok 7/9/06 - JH good K sucks 7/10/06 - JHK good 7/11/06 - JHK bad pointing, bad quality - confirm Maryam's notes on 7/17/06 7/12/06 - JHK good - confirm Maryam's notes on 7/17/06 7/23/06 - JH good, K crap 6~ good templates ;;; ;;; tsn2004gk de-activated, set - 1 good template already ;;; ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 08/7/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Josh has finished reducing sem2005a! He is re-running the archive code so rsyncing can work more smoothly, in lieu of scp'ing over the mosaics/weights manually, which I did for sn2005am and sn2005bf. I made an rsync backup onto my external HD again. I will eventually set up remote file sharing on this drive so Maryam and Michael can access it if need be, but this is just a convenient precaution, considering that the data are backed up at berkelely, and Mt. Hopkins as well. I also have a backup of grb (/ptel1, /ptel2, /ptel5) on my external HD. ### ssh andrewfriedman@dhcp152-207.cfa.harvard.edu Enter password: [dhcp152-210:~] andrewfr% cd /Users/andrewfriedman/Public andyExternalHD is a symlink in my Public folder pointing to --> /Volumes/Lacie\ Disk/ ### the directory structure on /Volumes/Lacie\ Disk/ is: /IR /calframes /illumstats /logs /moved_ir_dirs /oldstuff /ptel1 /rawdata the symlinks to /workspace and /absphotometry did not transfer, but the files are in /data, listed below /data /ptel1 /bpm /bpm_data /by_proj /PAIRITEL-DATA /redux /v8.0 /IR /workspace ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 07/26/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Josh has made great progress reducing the sem2005a data, starting with March 2005 and now almost finished with April 2005. Since the telescope is shut down in August, it should be possible to catch up on 2004-05 reductions since there will be no reduction of nightly data. I have now rsynced all of March 2005 and most April 2005 data to the CfA. This means that several SNe: Ia: (sn2005am, sn2005ao), Ib/c: (sn2004gq, sn2004gt, sn2004gk), II: (sn2005ay ) from 2004-05 have both data and templates and are ready for photometry and science. I also made a backup of all the SN data onto my Lacie External 250GB Hard Drive into the pre-existing IR and data directories there in the top level rsync -avz afriedma@cfa0.cfa.harvard.edu:/pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR /Volumes/Lacie\ Disk/ rsync -avz afriedma@cfa0.cfa.harvard.edu:/pool/cluster2/data/ /Volumes/Lacie\ Disk/ SNTEMP SN No currently active SN - focus on templates before observatory closes ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 07/19/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I deactivated 3 SN, sn2006cp, sn2006cz, and sn2006do ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MARYAM, 07/17/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Moved (some of) /pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR/ptel1/ to /pool/cluster2/data, especially the 23 G of darkbank to make space on /pool/smsn1. Almost no data during the last month, except SNTEMP obs on July 10,11,12. SSHed them over by hand directly to /pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR/rawdata/ir20060712 and the SNTEMP directories. SNTEMP.6 SN.29 sn2005hg: 7/10/06 not reduced yet 7/11/06 2x JHK bad pointing (by ~ 1min in RA) for both 7/12/06 JHK good, 792 sec of eff. EXPTIME, bad edges (still!),1 good 30 min template, ? to go SNTEMP.36 SN.30 sn2005hk: 7/10/06 not reduced yet 7/11/06 JHK bad pointing (by ~ 2arcmin in DEC) AND bad quality (even though 1130 sec EXPTIME 7/12/06 JH ~OK, 1130sec of eff. EXPTIME, very bad edges (still!), K *BAD*, need template subtraction since it's < 1 arcsec from the host. 1 good 30 min template, ? to go SNTEMP.37 SN.27 sn2005eu: 7/10/06 not reduced yet 7/11/06 JHK bad pointing (by ?) AND bad quality (even though 1150 sec EXPTIME 7/12/06 JH good, ~1100 sec of eff. EXPTIME, bad edges (still!) & weird PSF & general stripes, K *BAD*, 1 good 30 min template, ? to go SNTEMP.38 SN.31 sn2005iq (not observed by 1.5m): 7/10/06 not reduced yet 7/11/06 JHK bad pointing (by ?) AND bad quality 7/12/06 JH good, ~1170 sec of eff. EXPTIME, bad edges (still!), K *BAD* (skysubtraction?), 1 good 30 min template, ? to go Changed the priorities of the remaining templates to 100 : SNTEMP.32,33 changed SNTEMP.6 (05hg) to 50 R-activated SNTEMP.21 (05ek) since it's up at the end of the night again. Checked other templates which need more obs: SNTEMP.32: observed on Apr. 25,26,27, but no Mosaics done (though that night has been processed) ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANDY, 6/27/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deactivated several SN to free up room for SNTEMP observations before the monsoon season SN.42 sn2006X You have selected to de-activate the object: sn2006X - SN still visible as of 6/18/06 but huge number of epochs observed > 70 - really wanted to push to see the late time behavior, possible 3rd peak in JHK LC SN.46 sn2006az You have selected to de-activate the object: sn2006az - SN faded as of 6/18/06 SN.45 sn2006ax You have selected to de-activate the object: sn2006ax - setting, only up 1st hour of night as of 6/27/06 - last observed 5/11/06 SN.48 sn2006bq You have selected to de-activate the object: sn2006bq - SN faded as of 6/21/06 (6/21/06 image could serve as template image) SN.49 sn2006cp - 5 epochs observed and reduced as of 6/27/06 - Still visible as of 6/19/06 - on the rise?, discovered 5/28/06 - changed cadence to 40 hours - changed priority 70--> 50 You are going to alter the observations of object: sn2006cp Number of matches to sn2006cp in obs database: 25 Your old priority was: 70 the new priority is: 50 Your old worst observation spacing was: 20.00 the new spacing is: 40 SN.50 sn2006cz - 4 epochs observed and reduced as of 6/27/06 - 6/17, 6/18, 6/19, 6/21 J images excellent, SN visible, but faint discovered 6/14/06 - changed cadence to 60 hours - changed priority 70-->20 You are going to alter the observations of object: sn2006cz Number of matches to sn2006cz in obs database: 46 Your old priority was: 70 the new priority is: 20 Your old worst observation spacing was: 20.00 the new spacing is: 60 ------------- Active SN ------------- You have selected info for the project: SN Connected successfully to remote database Number of active objects in Project: 2 Name, ObjID, Total Observations, Remaining Observations sn2006cp, SN.49, 30, 25 sn2006cz, SN.50, 50, 46 -------------- Active SNTEMP -------------- You have selected info for the project: SNTEMP Connected successfully to remote database Number of active objects in Project: 7 Name, ObjID, Total Observations, Remaining Observations as of 6/27/06 tsn2006E, SNTEMP.33, 9, 5 tsn2006D, SNTEMP.32, 9, 5 tsn2004gk, SNTEMP.5, 8, 6 tsn2005hg, SNTEMP.6, 11, 10 tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 5, 5 tsn2005hk, SNTEMP.36, 5, 5 tsn2005eu, SNTEMP.37, 5, 5 tsn2005iq, SNTEMP.38, 5, 5 select * from object where ProjId = 'SNTEMP' and IsActive = 'yes' SNTEMP.33 SNTEMP yes tsn2006E 208.369 5.20617 50 2006-04-26 06:39:49 0 1.92611 J2000 up 1st 4 hours, 6/25/06 ***monsoon soon, but SN still visible ***0 good templates, but 2 good SNTEMP images were taken with SN still visible You are going to alter the observations of object: tsn2006E Number of matches to tsn2006E in obs database: 5 Your old priority was: 50 the new priority is: 20 Your old worst observation spacing was: 60 the new spacing is: 100 SNTEMP.32 SNTEMP yes tsn2006D 193.141 -9.77522 50 2006-04-27 05:36:37 0 1.94583 J2000 up 1st 3 hours, 6/25/06 ***3 nights 4/21, 4/25,4/27 no redux so we could already have templates ***0 confirmed good templates You are going to alter the observations of object: tsn2006D Number of matches to tsn2006D in obs database: 5 Your old priority was: 50 the new priority is: 20 Your old worst observation spacing was: 20.00 the new spacing is: 100 SNTEMP.5 SNTEMP yes tsn2004gk 186.388 12.2611 50 2006-05-14 05:35:18 0 1.48583 J2000 up 1st 3 hours - 6/25/06 ***already have 1 template You are going to alter the observations of object: tsn2004gk Number of matches to tsn2004gk in obs database: 6 Your old priority was: 50 the new priority is: 10 Your old worst observation spacing was: 60 the new spacing is: 100 SNTEMP.6 SNTEMP yes tsn2005hg 28.9245 46.7965 100 2006-01-18 03:10:33 0 0.975833 J2000 up last 2 hours - 6/25/06 SNTEMP.34 SNTEMP yes tsn2005hf 21.7749 19.1168 100 0000-00-00 00:00:00 0 0 J2000 up last 2 hrs, 6/25/06 - p10 SNTEMP.35 SNTEMP yes tsn2006ac 190.437 35.0686 80 0000-00-00 00:00:00 0 0 J2000 up 1st 3 hours, 6/25/06 - p100-->80, SN may still be visible and it's up 3 hours You have selected to de-activate the object: tsn2006ac The late time images from 4/8, 4/9, 4/12, 4/17, 4/21 - SN has faded - these can serve as galaxy templates -also in Maryam's notes on MARYAM, 4/22/06 SNTEMP.36 SNTEMP yes tsn2005hk 6.96196 -1.19792 100 0000-00-00 00:00:00 0 0 J2000 up last 3 hours, 6/25/06 The following objects are barely up but we can try to go after them now Your new object with name 'tsn2005eu' will have ObjID 'SNTEMP.37' You have requested 5 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005eu' Your 5 observations of object 'tsn2005eu' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.37.1' Your new object with name 'tsn2005iq' will have ObjID 'SNTEMP.38' You have requested 5 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005iq' Your 5 observations of object 'tsn2005iq' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.38.1' SNTEMP.37 SNTEMP yes tsn2005eu 36.9302 28.1768 100 0000-00-00 00:00:00 0 0 J2000 SNTEMP.38 SNTEMP yes tsn2005iq 359.635 -18.7092 100 0000-00-00 00:00:00 0 0 J2000 ;late time images of SN as templates: SN.ID sn_name SNTEMP.ID good/failed/noreduxSNTEMP late_temp late time J images with no SN last J SN obs comments SN.18 sn2005el SNTEMP.24 0 / 1 / 0 0 - 12/4 no - Ia SN.21 sn2005ek SNTEMP.21 0 / 0 / 0 0 - 10/29 no - Ic SN.24 sn2005eo SNTEMP.22 6 / 1 / 2 ? (12/4) (12/4) ? - Ic - buried in galaxy - hard to tell - but have 6 good templates SN.25 sn2005M006 SNTEMP.8 1 / 0 / 0 ? (11/29) (11/29) ? - Ia or Ic - buried in galaxy - but have 1 good template SN.26 sn2005eq SNTEMP.25 0 / 0 / 0 0 - 12/7 no - Ia SN.27 sn2005eu SNTEMP.37 0 / 0 / 0 SN.43 sn2006ac SNTEMP.35 0 / 0 / 0 5 4/17, 4/12, 4/9, 4/8, (4/6) 3/31 yes - Ia - ! deactivated SNTEMP.35 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 6/19/06-6/26/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- recently de-activated SNTEMP 05ao, 05ak, 05bl, 05bo, 05az, 05cc, 05cf, 05ch, 05cs - observations complete, at least 1 template 06N - set Currently Active SNTEMP You have selected info for the project: SNTEMP Connected successfully to remote database Number of active objects in Project: 7 Name, ObjID, TotalObs, RemainingObs tsn2006E, SNTEMP.33, 9, 5 tsn2006D, SNTEMP.32, 9, 5 tsn2005kl, SNTEMP.30, 10, 5 tsn2004gk, SNTEMP.5, 8, 6 tsn2005hg, SNTEMP.6, 11, 10 tsn2005ay, SNTEMP.13, 9, 4 tsn2005hf, SNTEMP.34, 5, 5 New (not necessarily comprehensive since archive and rsync not working all the time): If not rsynced, use ds9 to look at them directly on lyra tsn2004gk SNTEMP.5 5/14/06 - JHK crap (1 good, 1/7/06 - 1 hr) tsn2005ay SNTEMP.13 4/20/06 - not rsynced JH good, K DNE 4/21/06 - not rsynced J good but artifacts, H good, K ok 6/16/06 - rsynced - JHK good You have selected to de-activate the object: tsn2005ay 6/25/06 enough templats - 5 tsn2006N SNTEMP.31 4/20/06 - not rsynced - not archived - JH good K ok, but SN may still be visible tsn2005bf SNTEMP.3 4/20/06 - not rsynced - JHK good (but Maryam doesn't need them anymore - LC done) tsn2005eo SNTEMP.22 4/20/06 - not rsynced - JH good, K ok 4/21/06 - not rsynced - tsn2005ao SNTEMP.10 6/1/06 - rsynced - J good but streaks at chip boundaries, H good, K Ok, streaks 6/14/06 - rsynced - JH good, K ok 6/15/06 - rsynced - JHK good already set to inactive 6/25/06 4 good templates tsn2005ak SNTEMP.11 6/1/06 - rsynced - J good, H good but artifacts, K good 6/14/06 - rsynced - JH good, K not good SNTEMP.ID SN GoodTemp Up? Changes SNTEMP.5 04gk 1 1st 4 hr. p10-->80, changed cadence 20-->60 hr SNTEMP.31 06N 0 set De-activated Was 4/20/06 not archived? 4/21/06 - parts were archived (and successfully rsynced over) and parts were not. look at new reduced template obs - directly on lyra if I can't rsync over. It takes forever to load ds9, but it works eventually. Some templates not yet rsynced over (or not yet reduced but more likely the former) Your new object with name 'tsn2006ac' will have ObjID 'SNTEMP.35' You have requested 5 observations of the object with name 'tsn2006ac' Your 5 observations of object 'tsn2006ac' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.35.1' You have selected to de-activate the object: tsn2005ay enough templates You have selected to de-activate the object: tsn2005kl enough templates Your new object with name 'tsn2005hk' will have ObjID 'SNTEMP.36' You have requested 5 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005hk' Your 5 observations of object 'tsn2005hk' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.36.1' You are going to alter the observations of object: tsn2006ac Number of matches to tsn2006ac in obs database: 5 Your old priority was: 100 the new priority is: 80 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 6/13/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New images: SN still active: sn2006az, SN.46, 50, 28 - Last reduced image - 5/3/06 - JHK good - SN may have faded - late time image usable as a template sn2006X, SN.42, 110, 38 - SN still visible in JHK as of 5/23/06 5/12/06 - JHK good, SN still visible 5/23/06 - JH good, K DNE - SN still visible 6/13/06 changed cadence from 70 hours to 100 hours sn2006ax, SN.45, 50, 31 Last rsync 5/5/06 - , setting, as of 6/13/06 - only up in 1st 2 hours of night sn2006bq, SN.48, 50, 39 directory DNE at CfA as of 6/16/06 sn2006cp, SN.49, 30, 30 directory DNE at CfA as of 6/16/06 ;check on SN and SNTEMP ;pool disks back online! ;however, rsync does not seem to be working - oops, go to zeus, linux ;SNTEMP - successfully rsynced over /10, /11, /13, /14, /15, /16, /3, /4, /7, /9 ;/10 - no new images - last 4/17 ;/11 - no new images - last 4/17 ;'12 - /1 - sn2004fe - last 11/19/05 - no epochs observed 1 good template /2 - sn2004gq - last 11/19/05 - set 1 good template /3 - sn2005bf - New - 4/26/06 - JHK good - (Maryam probably won't re-reduce it.) 4 good templates /4 - sn2004gt - New - 4/26/06 - JHK good - fat galaxy New - 4/27/06 - JHK good 3 good templates /5 - sn2004gk - last 1/7/06 1 good template /6 - sn2005hg - last 1/18/06 - but bad - set 0 good templates /7 - sn2005mf - nothing new 2 good templates /8 - sn2005MOO6 - nothing new - set 1 good template /9 - sn2005am - New - 4/26/06 - JHK good New - 5/5/06 - JHK good 3 good templates /10 - sn2005ao - nothing new 1 good template /11 - sn2005ak - nothing new 1 good template /12 - sn2005al - nothing new - 1 epoch observed /13 - sn2005ay - nothing new 2 good templates /14 - sn2005bl - New - 4/26/06 - JHK good 2 good templates /15 - sn2005bo - New - 4/21/06 - JH good, K weird artifacts 2 good templates /16 - sn2005az - New - 4/21/06 - JH good, K ok 3 good templates /17 - sn2005cc - nothing new 3 good templates /18 - sn2005cf - nothing new 4 good templates, but 2 pairs on same night /19 - sn2005ch - nothing new 3 good templates /20 - sn2005cs - New 4/26/06 - JHK good - gigantic galaxy 1 good template /21 - sn2005ek - directory DNE /22 - sn2005eo - nothing new 2 good templates /23 - sn2005ec - directory DNE /24 - sn2005el - nothing new 0 good templates /25 - sn2005eq - directory DNE /26 - sn2005ke - directory DNE /27 - sn2005gj - directory DNE /28 - sn2005ls - directory DNE /29 - sn2005mc - New 5/4/06 - JHK crap - bad weather? /30 - sn2005kl - directory DNE /31 - sn2006N - directory DNE /32 - sn2006D - directory DNE - observed but not yet reduced, don't know if SN is still visible /33 - sn2006E - SN.40 - New 4/21/06 - JHK good - but SN still visible New 4/26/06 - JHK good - but SN still visible - ok, more LC data points ! ;SN - successfully rsynced over ;should de-activate some sn ;should ask Stephane if there are any new SNe ;look at late time images to see if SN has faded enough for template ;req 4 x 1800s sn2005ak - 1 good templates so far, p70 SNTEMP, tsn2005ak, 220.13358,3.5103056,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,4,20. ;req 4 x 1800s sn2005ao - 1 good templates so far, p70 SNTEMP, tsn2005ao, 266.20683,61.907806,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,4,20. ;req 5 x 1800s sn2005ay - 0 good templates so far, p100 SNTEMP, tsn2005ay, 178.20029,44.105111,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,100., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,5,20.;req 4 x 1800s sn2004gk - 1 good template so far, 90, up 1st 5 hours SNTEMP, tsn2004gk, 186.38837,12.261083,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,5,20. ;req 2 x 1800s sn2005cf - 2 good templates already - up 8 hours SNTEMP, tsn2005cf, 230.38421,-7.4131944,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,20., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,2,20. Your new object with name 'sn2006X1' will have ObjID 'SN.49' You have requested 50 observations of the object with name 'sn2006X1' Your 50 observations of object 'sn2006X1' were added beginning with observation ID 'SN.49.1' changed to sn2006cp in db Your new object with name 'sn2006cz' will have ObjID 'SN.50' You have requested 50 observations of the object with name 'sn2006cz' Your 50 observations of object 'sn2006cz' were added beginning with observation ID 'SN.50.1' An object with the Name tsn2005kl appears to be in the DataBase already with ObjID SNTEMP.30 You have requested 5 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005kl' Your 5 observations of object 'tsn2005kl' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.30.6' Your new object with name 'tsn2005hf' will have ObjID 'SNTEMP.34' You have requested 5 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005hf' Your 5 observations of object 'tsn2005hf' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.34.1' An object with the Name tsn2005hg appears to be in the DataBase already with ObjID SNTEMP.6 You have requested 5 observations of the object with name 'tsn2005hg' Your 5 observations of object 'tsn2005hg' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.6.7' An object with the Name tsn2006D appears to be in the DataBase already with ObjID SNTEMP.32 You have requested 5 observations of the object with name 'tsn2006D' Your 5 observations of object 'tsn2006D' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.32.5' An object with the Name tsn2006E appears to be in the DataBase already with ObjID SNTEMP.33 You have requested 5 observations of the object with name 'tsn2006E' Your 5 observations of object 'tsn2006E' were added beginning with observation ID 'SNTEMP.33.5' ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 5/29/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;check on SN and SNTEMP ;pool disks back online! ;however, rsync does not seem to be working - oops, go to zeus, linux ;SNTEMP - successfully rsynced over /10, /11, /13, /14, /15, /16, /3, /4, /7, /9 ;/10 - no new images - last 4/17 ;/11 - no new images - last 4/17 ;'12 - /1 - sn2004gt - last 11/19/05 - no epochs observed 1 good template /2 - sn2004gq - last 11/19/05 - set 1 good template /3 - sn2005bf - New - 4/26/06 - JHK good - (Maryam probably won't re-reduce it.) 4 good templates /4 - sn2004gt - New - 4/26/06 - JHK good - fat galaxy New - 4/27/06 - JHK good 3 good templates /5 - sn2004gk - last 1/7/06 1 good template /6 - sn2005hg - last 1/18/06 - but bad - set 0 good templates /7 - sn2005mf - nothing new 2 good templates /8 - sn2005MOO6 - nothing new - set 1 good template /9 - sn2005am - New - 4/26/06 - JHK good New - 5/5/06 - JHK good 3 good templates /10 - sn2005ao - nothing new 1 good template /11 - sn2005ak - nothing new 1 good template /12 - sn2005al - nothing new - 1 epoch observed /13 - sn2005ay - nothing new 2 good templates /14 - sn2005bl - New - 4/26/06 - JHK good 2 good templates /15 - sn2005bo - New - 4/21/06 - JH good, K weird artifacts 2 good templates /16 - sn2005az - New - 4/21/06 - JH good, K ok 3 good templates /17 - sn2005cc - nothing new 3 good templates /18 - sn2005cf - nothing new 4 good templates, but 2 pairs on same night /19 - sn2005ch - nothing new 3 good templates /20 - sn2005cs - New 4/26/06 - JHK good - gigantic galaxy 1 good template /21 - sn2005ek - directory DNE /22 - sn2005eo - nothing new 2 good templates /23 - sn2005ec - directory DNE /24 - sn2005el - nothing new 0 good templates /25 - sn2005eq - directory DNE /26 - sn2005ke - directory DNE /27 - sn2005gj - directory DNE /28 - sn2005ls - directory DNE /29 - sn2005mc - New 5/4/06 - JHK crap - bad weather? /30 - sn2005kl - directory DNE /31 - sn2006N - directory DNE ;SN - successfully rsynced over ;should de-activate some sn ;should ask Stephane if there are any new SNe ;look at late time images to see if SN has faded enough for template ;req 4 x 1800s sn2005ak - 1 good templates so far, p70 SNTEMP, tsn2005ak, 220.13358,3.5103056,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,4,20. ;req 4 x 1800s sn2005ao - 1 good templates so far, p70 SNTEMP, tsn2005ao, 266.20683,61.907806,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,4,20. ;req 5 x 1800s sn2005ay - 0 good templates so far, p100 SNTEMP, tsn2005ay, 178.20029,44.105111,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,100., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,5,20.;req 4 x 1800s sn2004gk - 1 good template so far, 90, up 1st 5 hours SNTEMP, tsn2004gk, 186.38837,12.261083,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,5,20. ;req 2 x 1800s sn2005cf - 2 good templates already - up 8 hours SNTEMP, tsn2005cf, 230.38421,-7.4131944,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,20., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,2,20. Your new object with name 'sn2006X1' will have ObjID 'SN.49' You have requested 50 observations of the object with name 'sn2006X1' Your 50 observations of object 'sn2006X1' were added beginning with observation ID 'SN.49.1' changed to sn2006cp in db ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 5/4/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SNTEMP observations from past 2 weeks observed but not yet reduced (other specific priority reductions took a lot of CPU time and Josh's time) Asked Josh to reduce these nights (on which SNTEMP objects were observed) with high priority: /ptel1/PAIRITEL-DATA/sem2006a/Dir2006-May-05 /ptel1/PAIRITEL-DATA/sem2006a/Dir2006-May-04 /ptel1/PAIRITEL-DATA/sem2006a/Dir2006-Apr-27 /ptel1/PAIRITEL-DATA/sem2006a/Dir2006-Apr-26 /ptel1/PAIRITEL-DATA/sem2006a/Dir2006-Apr-25 /ptel1/PAIRITEL-DATA/sem2006a/Dir2006-Apr-24 /ptel1/PAIRITEL-DATA/sem2006a/Dir2006-Apr-21 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;MARYAM, 4/22/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SN.ID SN last mosaic rsynced SN visible in J band as of last rsynced mosaic? last observed still up? status set to: Comments SN.38 2005na 04/12/06 no longer really visible ? 04/18/06 yes not active set to inactive SN.42 2006X 04/12/06 yes 04/21/06 yes active every 3 nights (70 hrs) SN.43 2006ac 04/17/06 not any longer -last images could be used as templates? 04/21/06 yes not active set to inactive SN.45 2006ax 04/12/06 well visible 04/14/06 yes active keep 1800 every night SN.46 2006az 04/17/06 hard to say whether visible but probably not, need subtractions!04/21/06 yes active every 2nd night for 1800 sec SN.47 2006be (II!)nothing rsynced N/A 03/29/06 yes not active set to inactive when type of SNII was determined ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 4/20/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- changed priority of tsn2005kl from 70-->90 up all 8 hours but want to make sure we get at least 1 good template requested 4 new template obs of tsn2006D (SN.39 SNTEMP.32) p50, up all night, but no good templates yet requested 4 new template obs of tsn2006E (SN.40 SNTEMP.33) p50, up all night, but no good templates yet requested 2 new template obs of tsn2005cs (SN.17 SNTEMP.20) p10 up all night, no good templates yet, but only 6 epochs observed, + Type II SNTEMP, tsn2006D, 193.14142,-9.7752222,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,50., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,4,20. SNTEMP, tsn2006E, 208.36883,5.2061667,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,50., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,4,20. SNTEMP, tsn2005cs, 202.47021,47.176750,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,20., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,2,20. ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 4/18/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- requested 3 more 1800 sec obs of SNTEMP.10 (SN.5, sn2005ao) - up last 5-6 hours of night, already have 1 good template, p 100-->60 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs of SNTEMP.11 (SN.6, sn2005ak) - up last 7 hours of night, already have 1 good template, p 90-->60 requested 1 more 1800 sec obs of SNTEMP.17 (SN.14, sn2005cc) - up all night, already have 3 good templates, p 40-->20 changed priority for SNTEMP.29 p 80-->60 SNTEMP.10 SN.5 sn2005ao 4/17/06 JHK good, bad edges, 1 good, template, 3 to go SNTEMP.11 SN.6 sn2005ak 4/17/06 JHK good, some artifacts, 1 good template, 3 to go SNTEMP.13 SN.8 sn2005ay 4/17/06 JH good, K ok, 1 good 1hr template, 1 good 30 min template, 2 to go SNTEMP.16 SN.13 sn2005az 4/17/06 JHK good, some black hole artifacts, 1 good 1hr template, 1 good 30 min template, 2 to go SNTEMP.17 SN.14 sn2005cc 4/17/06 JHK good, some black hole artifacts, 3 good templates, 1 to go SNTEMP.22 SN.24 sn2005eo 4/17/06 JH good, K ok, 2 good templates, 2 to go SNTEMP.29 SN.37 sn2005mc 4/17/06 JH good, K ok, 2 good templates, 3 to go ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 4/15/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- requested 5 1800 sec observations for tsn2006N (SNTEMP.31, SN.41) - 0 good templates so far, priority 100, up only 1st 3 hours of night, 31 epochs observed ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 4/14/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SNTEMP.7 - 4/8/06 J ok, HK crap --> redo 4/9/06 J does not exist, HK crap (bad weather) --> redo SNTEMP.24 - 4/9/06 JK crap, H does not exist (bad weather) --> redo SNTEMP.9 - change 1/27/06 to JHK good (1 hr) SNTEMP.8 - change 1/18/06 to JHK good (1 hr) New templates added requested 5 1800 sec observations for tsn2005kl (SNTEMP.30, SN.33) - 0 good templates so far, priority 70, up whole night 8 hours, 40 epochs observed Old SNTEMP.ID new observations added (still with goal of getting 5 templates - may temper this goal as is necessary) requested 4 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005eo (SNTEMP.22, SN.24) - up 1st 5 hours, already have 1 good template, 70-->80, 1-4 failed templates (bad weather), 48 epochs requested 4 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005mc (SNTEMP.29, SN.37) - up 1st 5 hours, already have 1 good template, 70-->80, 4 failed templates (bad weather), 49 epochs requested 4 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005az (SNTEMP.16, SN.13) - up whole night - lower priority 70-->40 since it will be up for a while, 1 good 1hr template so far requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005ao (SNTEMP.10, SN.5) - up last 5-6 hours of night, 0 good templates yet, priority 70-->100 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005ak (SNTEMP.11, SN.6) - up last 7 hours of night, 0 good templates yet, priority 70-->90 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005am (SNTEMP.9, SN.1) - up 1st 4 hours, 1 good 1hr template, priority 80 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2004gk (SNTEMP.5, SN.4) - up almost whole night, 1 good 1hr template, priority 12-->10 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2004gt (SNTEMP.4, SN.3) - up middle 5 hours of night, 1 good 1hr template, 41 epochs, 12-->40 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005cc (SNTEMP.17, SN.14) - up whole night, already have 2 good templates, 2 failed templates (bad weather), 29 epochs, 70-->40 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005mf (SNTEMP.7, SN.37) - already have 2 good templates, but still up 1st 5-6 hours of night, priority 70-->40 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005bo (SNTEMP.15, SN.12) - up almost whole night, already have 1 good 1hr template, only 17 epochs observed, priority 70-->40 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005bl (SNTEMP.14, SN.10 - up 1st 8 hours, 1 good 1hr template, 22 epochs obs, priority 70-->40 requested 3 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005ay (SNTEMP.13, SN.8) - up almost whole night, 1 good 1hr template, 17 epochs, priority 70-->40 requested 2 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005bf (SNTEMP.3, SN.11) - up 1st 5 hours, priority changed 100 --> 80 since we already have 3 good templates requested 1 more 1800 sec obs for tsn2005cs,(SNTEMP.20, SN.17) - did not ask for more than 1 more template since only 6 epochs were observed and its a type II 70-->10 changed priority of tsn2005el (SNTEMP.24, SN.18) from 70 to 100 - only up in 1st 2 hours of night - want to make sure it gets observed - 4 to go change priority to 100 for SN with no templates yet if they are in danger of setting soon - i.e. only up for a couple hours near the end of the night now change priority to 80 or above for sn with no templates even if they will be up for most of the night for many months changed tsn2005al (SNTEMP.12, SN.7) to inactive - only 1 epoch observed changed tsn2004fe (SNTEMP.1,SN.133,SN.136) to inactive - no epochs observed changed tsn2005ls (STEMP.28, SN.35) to inactive - already set for ptel changed tsn2005gj (SNTEMP.27, SN.34) to inactive - already set for ptel changed tsn2005ke (SNTEMP.26, SN,32) to inactive - already set for ptel changed tsn2005hg (SNTEMP.6, SN.29) to inactive - already set for ptel changed tsn2005eq (SNTEMP.25, SN.26) to inactive - already set for ptel changed tsn2005M006 (SNTEMP.8, SN.25) to inactive - only up last hour, high airmass changed tsn2005ek (SNTEMP.21, SN.21) to inactive - already set for ptel changed tsn2004gq (SNTEMP.2, SN.2) to inactive - already set for ptel changed tsn2005ec (SNTEMP.23, SN.19) to inactive - only 3 epochs observed later could add 1 more observation - but change priority of tsn2005ec (SNTEMP.23, SN.19) from 70 to 10 - only 3 epochs observed change priorities of template SN that are still up some of the later SN were still visible from ptel when they set, so there was no way to avoid waiting until next year for templates. However, we really should pound on the 2004-05 data to get at least 1 good template before they set still up? SN. sn2004gq SN still visible or no epochs, SN.47, SN.46, SN.45, SN.43, SN.42, SN.38 SN.ID SNTEMP.ID sn_name epochs templates still up for ptel HA limit -410??? - still 5 to go (will set to inactive before finishing more than 1) #or choose high priority for above so it actually gets observed - moot point just 3 data points in LC SN.18 SNTEMP.24 sn2005el 50 0 yes - up in 2 hours of night - change priority to 100 so it gets observed - still 4 to go SN.17 SNTEMP.20 sn2005cs 6 0 yes up all night 8 hours - but only 6 epochs observed, Type II - add observations but lower priority SN.16 SNTEMP.19 sn2005ch 15 3 yes - up almost whole night last 8 hrs - leave active but don't add new obs yet - already have 3 good templates - priority irrelevant right now since 0 observation are left until I add more SN.15 SNTEMP.18 sn2005cf 30 4 yes - up last 8 hrs of night - leave active but don't add new obs yet - already have 4 good templates (although only on 2 separate nights 3/26/06 and 3/31/06) - priority irrelevant right now since 0 observation are left until I add more SN.14 SNTEMP.17 sn2005cc 29 2 yes - up whole night SN.13 SNTEMP.16 sn2005az 22 1hr yes - up whole night SN.12 SNTEMP.15 sn2005bo 17 1hr yes - up almost whole night SN.11 SNTEMP.3 sn2005bf 26 3 yes - up 1st 5 hours SN.10 SNTEMP.14 sn2005bl 22 1hr yes - up 1st 8 hours SN.9 SNTEMP.XX sn05_n4059 0 - --- no epochs observed SN.8 SNTEMP.13 sn2005ay 17 1hr yes - up almost whole night SN.7 SNTEMP.12 sn2005al 1 0 --- 1 epoch observed SN.6 SNTEMP.11 sn2005ak 44 0 yes - up last 7 hours of night SN.5 SNTEMP.10 sn2005ao 37 0 yes - up last 5-6 hours of night (epochs include SN.5 + SN.152) SN.4 SNTEMP.5 sn2004gk 120 1hr yes - up almost whole night (epochs include SN.4 + SN.142, but I don't really believe it) SN.3 SNTEMP.4 sn2004gt 41 1hr yes - up in middle 4-5 hours of night (epochs include SN.3 + SN.146) SN.2 SNTEMP.2 sn2004gq 23 lhr no (epochs include SN.2 + SN.143) SN.1 SNTEMP.9 sn2005am 33 1hr yes - up 1st 4 hours of night ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 4/11/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ptel template page updated will schedule new round of templates on Friday, April 14 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 4/3/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ptel SN, 2004-05, and template page updated nothing new on rsync for SN or SNTEMP ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 3/27/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ptel SN and template page updated, Errors on template page fixed (below): >Could you please update the templates and current PAIRITEL webpage to >include the changes noted on ptel_notes.html ? Also, there is a mistake >in keeping track of the templates in the 04-05 season (on the webpage): >SNTEMP.8 is fine and rsynced, but SNTEMP. 9-12 are not I asked Josh to reduce the 2006-Jan-27 data which has SNTEMP.9-SNTEMP.12 with high priority New template observation procedure - 5 separate nights of 1800 sec Once newer templates Maryam just added are observed, will re-schedule SNTEMP.17-SNTEMP.20 they were taken during the dither problems on 2006-Feb-10 CORRECTION - Maryam already re-scheduled SNTEMP.17-SNTEMP.20 for 5 x 1800sec observations Andy will now be in charge of templates: adding them to queue, rsyncing them over and checking template images, making sure all templates for all SNe get observed (updates on template web page). ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;MARYAM, 3/24/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;MARYAM, 3/9/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;MARYAM, 2/15/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;MARYAM, 2/9/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 1/29/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rsynced - templates for SNTEMP.4 - SNTEMP.8, but did not look at image quality. SN.38 2006N - I just added sn2006N, a bright (14.9 mag optical as of Jan 25) young Type Ia on the rise. SN, sn2006N, 92.130167,64.723639,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 1800.0, 2.5, 2.5,.3,-1,50,20. ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 1/26/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I added 4 new 1 hour single observation template requests for Ia's. SNTEMP, tsn2005am, 139.05196,-16.304444,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 3600.0,2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,1,20. SNTEMP, tsn2005ao, 266.20683, 61.907806,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 3600.0,2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,1,20. SNTEMP, tsn2005ak, 220.13358, 3.5103056,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 3600.0,2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,1,20. SNTEMP, tsn2005al, 207.50137,-30.576167,1,1.0,50.0,12.,12.,70., 3600.0,2.5, 2.5, .3,-1,1,20. sn2005ao is only up for a couple hours towards the end of the night sn2005al is also up late and with Airmass < 2.5 only for the last 3 hours of the night (Airmass ~2.1-2.3), but this is less than the 2.5 cutoff, so I thought it would be Ok. As far as I can tell, the last 3 templates we requested (sn2005mf, sn2005M006, and sn2005hg) were all observed but not yet reduced. I'll keep bugging Josh. I also put up a web page (also linked from the ptel_sn page with the link named "up?") with basic information about how to check if an object is observable by pairitel. http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~afriedman/up.htm ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 1/13/06 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SNTEMP.5 2004gk - recently requested by Maryam - still backlog on reduction at Berkeley SNTEMP.4 2004gt - recently requested by Maryam - still backlog on reduction at Berkeley SN.38 2005na - No new data from rsync yet, according to Maryam. I will bug Josh to reduce things this week. SN.37 2005mc - No new data from rsync yet, according to Maryam. I will bug Josh to reduce things this week. SN.36 2005mf - No new data from rsync yet, according to Maryam. I will bug Josh to reduce things this week. SN.35 2005ls - No new data from rsync yet, according to Maryam. I will bug Josh to reduce things this week. SN.34 2005gj - Maryam set it to inactive, We were pointing at the wrong field the whole time! The RA was input incorrectly. R.A. = 03h01m11s.95, Decl. = -00¡33'13".9, ptel database: 3.01999, -0.553861, BUT should have been: 45.299792, 0.55386111 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 12/8/05 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SNTEMP.3 2005bf - Template requested today. They have a data reduction backlog at Berkeley, so sync_ptelt will not work until the raw templates have been reduced. This may not happen for a couple of weeks. ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 12/7/05 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SNTEMP.2 2005fe - Ptel DB shows 1.39389 hours completed but where is the file stored when we rsync it over? it's not in /pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR/rawdata/SN SNTEMP.1 2005gq - Ptel DB shows 0.985 hours completed but where is the file stored when we rsync it over? it's not in /pool/smsn1/data/v8.0/IR/rawdata/SN SN.34 2005gj - J image good quality 12/4 but I can't identify SN - optical finding chart only has a few stars and IR field has many stars ?pointing problem SN.33 2005kl - J image 12/4 good, but SN buried in galaxy, hard to see SN.32 2005ke - Last observed 12/4 J image good, still visible at SW edge of galaxy, no obs beteween 11/17 and 12/4 . Only 3 nights of data so far SN.31 2005iq - Last observed 11/19, SN visible but strange artifacts in J band, but not H, K. However, H,K 11/19 quality poor as usual. SN.30 2005hk - Last observed 11/19, J image excellent, H good, K ok SN still very visible, rising, but no observations since then. SN.29 2005hg - Still visible in excellent 12/7 J image, good H, good K . But no observations between Nov 17 and Dec 7 SN.28 2005hf - Nov 19 J image good, but I still can't tell if the SN is visible. No data since 11/19. Will leave cadence at 1 day for now. SN.27 2005eu - Still visible in 11/19 J image, but no data since then? SN.26 2005eq - Still visible on Dec 7, in J,H, Dec 4 in J. Still visible in J Nov 17. No data in between. Keep cadence at 4 days, but how come there are so many missing days? SN.24 2005eo - Faded. Set to inactive. ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;ANDY, 11/19/05 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SN.32 2005ke - JH images for Nov 16, 17 look good, K sucks, double stars on Nov 16, still visible (only 2 nights of data so far) SN.31 2005iq - J Nov 10,13 - lots of noise, Nov 15 great, Nov 16 strange hole in image center, H ok, K crap, SN still visible as of Nov 17 SN.30 2005hk - J images start on Nov 4, (Nov 5,7,8 OK), Nov 14, 15 excellent, Nov 16 strange artifacts, H ok, K crap, SN still visible as of Nov 17th, appears to be still rising in brightness SN.29 2005hg - Hard to identify SN inside host galaxy, but probably still visible - discovered 10/25/05, J band - Nov 12 good, Nov 13,15 ok, Nov 16 good, SN still visible as of Nov 16th SN.24 2005eo - 2005eo not visible, but 05en still visible as of Nov 16, but fading - give it 1 more week - its at 4 day cadence anyway which Maryam set last week. SN.18 2005el - still visible in Nov 16 J image, Nov 17 poor quality - keep cadence at 4 days SN.28 2005hf - Hard to see so close to galaxy nucleus. Could still be visible in Nov 16 image, but it just could be fuzz. What surface plot programs does the CfA have? What can ds9 do? SN.27 2005eu - Still visible in J Nov 16th image. Keep cadence at 1 day. This is a really isolated SN! Where is the galaxy? SN.26 2005eq - Still visible in J Nov 16th. keep cadence at 4 days. SN.25 2005M006 -I found a pdf of the finding chart and made it into 2 jpegs, one for the whole field and another for a blowup of the galaxy. Buy I'm still confused as to how to find info about SN with nonstandard names that don't show up on the Rochester Latest SNe page. Do you just scan through the IAUC and ATELs? When does it get named anyway? In any case, I can't tell if its stil there since it's buried in the nucleus. Strange artifacts in Nov 16 J image. Any suggestions on what ds9 can do to help see these kinds of SNe? SN.21 2005ek - inactive - last notes until getting galaxy templates. What does "unknown" status mean for PAIRITEL? when 05hf, 05eu, 05eq, and 05M006 are unknown but still active since we are still getting data? Also, how do I modify the cadence? ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;MARYAM, 11/11/05 ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please craft a similar summary next week, when you're looking at the SNe data. I'll keep the task of adding new ones to the queue but you should look at whether they are still visible and adjust the cadences accordingly; also check whether there new observations might need to be added. (Most of) the finding charts are in /data/wdocs/oir/www-docs/Research/supernova/finders Cheers, Maryam 31 -- sn2005iq, Ia: UT Nov 10, only visible in J 30 -- sn2005hk, Ia: UT Nov,4,5,7,8 well visible, problems with Kband 29 -- sn2005hg, Ib: UT Nov,4-10: very well visible, Nov 10 very good quality 28 -- sn2005hf, Ia: UT Oct 29,30,4,5,7: hard to say since buried in galaxy center, but looks like it's still visible 27 -- sn2005eu, Ia: UT Oct 20 - Nov 10 (with 1-2 nights missing in between): still very visible 26 -- sn2005eq, Ia: UT Oct 5-Nov 10 (") still visible 25 -- sn2005M006, Ia or Ic: UT Oct1-Nov 10 (") still visible (in J)! 25 -- sn2005eo, Ic: " ,no longer visible, but 05en is, in the same galaxy 21 -- sn2005ek, Ic: UT Sept27 - Oct 30 18 -- sn2005el, Ia: UT Sept 26 - Nov 7 still visible I changed the candences for the following SNe to 4days: sn2005el sn2005eo sn2005M006 sn2005eq ;----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ;START OF RUNNING PAIRITEL SN PROJECT NOTES ;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------