![]() |
Gamma-ray Bursts![]() |
|
I have
designed a dedicated, multi-wavelength campaign utilizing radio, X-ray
and optical facilities to target the
nearest (z < 0.3) GRBs. While early studies suggested
that all GRBs
produce roughly the 1051 erg of relativistic energy, I have
shown that this is not entirely true. In fact, though my dedicated
study, I have discovered a new class
of explosions that
are sub-energetic compared to typical GRBs and only detectable
nearby. These sub-energetic GRBs are further differentiated from
ordinary bursts in that they (1) show no evidence for strongly
collimated jets, and (2) are up to 10 times more common. In two
recent Nature papers, I discuss the
properties of this large class of sub-energetic GRBs lurking in the
nearby Universe.
Soderberg
et al. , 2004, Nature, 430, 648See my press release page to read the International media response to this exciting discovery. Soderberg et al., 2006, Nature, 442, 1014 |
![]() Energy released in
gamma-rays is compared to the ejecta kinetic energy for cosmological
GRBs (upper right) and the newly discoverd class of sub-energetic
bursts (labeled). Typical bursts release ~1051 erg in
gamma-rays and have ~1051 erg in ejecta energy
implying a total relativistic energy yield of 2x1051 erg
(arc). The nearest GRBs (labeled) are outliers in one or both
axes
|
|
Discovered in the 1990's, the
class of XRFs are distinguished by their X-ray rich prompt emission
spectrum that peaks a factor of 10 lower than those of GRBs. While
several lines
of evidence (e.g.~durations) initially suggested that the mysterious
XRFs are similar to GRBs, the
lack of XRF redshift measurements prevented a clear comparison. In
2003, I set the distance scale to
XRFs by measuring the first redshift,
z=0.25, to XRF 020903 (right).
Not only did this breakthrough establish that
XRFs are cosmological in origin, but also showed that their total
energy output is similar to that of GRBs. Finally, my discovery
of a supernova associated with an XRF showed that they too are produced
by the death of massive stars.
Soderberg
et al. 2004, ApJ, 606, 994See my press release page to read the media response to this exciting discovery. Soderberg et al., 2005, ApJ, 627, 877 |
![]() The first redshift: XRF 020903 is localized to a star forming host galaxy at z=0.25. |
|
Just like ordinary SNe Ibc,
GRBs
and XRFs produce strong optical emission on timescales less than 30
days after the explosion attributed to the
radioactive decay of Nickel-56. Through a
comprehensive investigation utilizing both ground-based and Hubble Space Telecope data, I
compared the optical luminosities for GRB-SNe, XRF-SNe, and ordinary
SNe Ibc. As shown at right, I found that the classes are
remarkably similar. This surprising
result suggests that there is a common Nickel-56 production mechanism
for GRBs, XRFs, and ordinary SNe and may even suggest similar
explosion
mechanisms. This result was not anticipated given that GRBs
and XRFs require central "engines" (accreting compact source) to power
their
gamma-ray emission while ordinary SNe do not.
See my SN page to read more about my research on ordinary SNe Ibc and their relation to GRBs and XRFs. Soderberg et al., 2005, ApJ, 627, 877 Soderberg et al., 2006. ApJ, 636, 391 |
![]() Optical luminosities of GRB-SNe and ordinary SNe Ibc. The two distributions are remarkably similar suggesting that GRB-SNe and ordinary SNe have similar Nickel-56 production mechanisms. |