Harvard University

Astronomy 200 - Fall'2001: Redshift Surveys and Cosmology

Catalog Number: 8574
Christopher S. Kochanek, Krzysztof Z. Stanek and members of the CfA

Wednesdays, 4-5 p.m. in Pratt, unless otherwise noted.

Graduate seminar on topical areas in modern astrophysics and cosmology. Each semester a different topic of current special interest is selected. Participants in this seminar discuss papers given by seminar members (in rotation). Several faculty members also participate.

Note: Participation for three semesters is required to obtain credit for this course.


Schedule for Fall'2001:

*0. September 12th, 2001

"Organizational meeting" - Chris Kochanek and Kris Stanek

Abstract:

How the course is organized. Motivation for the topic. Brief talk on "How to give talks". Scheduling the talks.

General reading material for the Semester:

P. J. E. Pebbles "Principles of Physical Cosmology"

J. A. Peacock "Clustering of Mass and Galaxies" (astro-ph/0002013)


*1. September 19th, 2001

"Redshift Surveys: How they are Done" - Warren R. Brown

Abstract:

I will describe how to construct a redshift survey and summarize the many technical issues involved. First, I describe what the terms "redshift" and "redshift survey" mean. Selecting a redshift sample is critically important to a survey. Performing accurate galaxy photometry runs into issues of resolution, photometric calibration, limiting surface brightness, k-corrections, and galactic extinction corrections. Measuring galaxy velocities runs into the limitations of spectrographs, errors in calibration and cross-correlation, and the intrinsic motions of the galaxies themselves.

I will end with a brief history of redshift surveys, both pencil-beam and large-area local surveys. I compare the "faint end slopes" of the galaxy luminosity function (measured by local redshift surveys) and find evidence of sampling problems. I compare the total luminosity densities and find evidence of large scale structure influencing the results.

Reading material:

W. R. Brown et al. "V- and R- Galaxy Luminosity Functions and Low Surface Brightness Galaxies in the Century Survey" (2001, AJ, 122, first six pages 714-719)

M. J. Geller " The Unexplored Redshift Survey" (2001, PASP, 113, 405)

L. N. da Costa "Galaxy Redshift Surveys: 20 years later" (astro-ph/9812258)


*2. September 26th, 2001

"Redshift Surveys: Why they are Done" - Alceste Bonanos

Abstract:

Redshift surveys are very useful for measuring cosmological parameters of the Universe and constraining models of it. We can learn a lot about properties of galaxies by measuring the luminosity function and finding its shape and normalization locally. Most importantly, redshift surveys reveal the large scale structure of the Universe. Statistical measures of galaxy clustering are the correlation function and power spectrum. Describing mathematically the clustering of galaxies with the above quantities, we can probe the nature of dark matter, the form of primordial density fluctuations and cosmological parameters (Omega and H_0). However, galaxy biasing is an unresolved issue. Nonetheless, redshift surveys, together with the CMB fluctuations, are the basis for understanding the nature and evolution of structure in the Universe.

Reading material:

M. J. Geller " The Unexplored Redshift Survey" (2001, PASP, 113, 405)

L. N. da Costa "Galaxy Redshift Surveys: 20 years later" (astro-ph/9812258)


*3. October 3rd, 2001

"Redshift Surveys: How They Have Been Done" - Kenneth J. Rines

Abstract:

I will briefly describe some of the major redshift surveys of the past 25 years. Common themes in the history of redshift surveys are improvements in sample size and selection and in our understanding of selection effects. I will discuss some of the selection effects both explicit and implicit in these surveys and show a few examples of how different selection effects can yield dramatically different results. Finally, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different types of redshift surveys for different applications.

Reading material:

W. Saunders et al "The PSCz catalogue" (2000, MNRAS, 317, 55)

L. N. da Costa "The Southern Sky Redshift Survey" (1998, AJ, 116, 1)

M. J. Geller et al. "The Century Survey: A Deeper Slice of the Universe" (1997, AJ, 114, 2205)

S. A. Shectman et al. "The Las Campanas Redshift Survey" (1996, ApJ, 470, 172)

J. Loveday et al. "The Stromlo-APM Redshift Survey. I - The luminosity function and space density of galaxies" (1992, ApJ, 390, 338)

V. de Lapparent, M. J. Geller and J. P. Huchra "A slice of the universe" (1986, ApJ, 302, L1)

R. P. Kirshner et al. "A million cubic megaparsec void in Bootes" (1981, ApJ, 248, L57)


*4. October 10th, 2001

"Redshift surveys past, present and future - part II" - Gaspar Bakos

Abstract:

As a continuation of the previous talk in this series, "Redshift surveys past, present and future", I will give technical details on two recent major surveys, discuss similarities and differences, and draft early results.

The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) is a major new spectroscopic survey carried out in the Anglo-Australian Observatory, and integrated with the 2dF QSO survey. The survey aims to obtain high-quality spectra and redshifts for 250,000 galaxies brighter than ~b_J=19.5. The galaxies cover an area of ~2000 sq.deg. selected from both galactic caps.

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is a very large undertaking to map a quarter of the sky in 5 photometric bands (u', g', r', i', and z') to about 23rd magnitude in g', r', and i', and to take spectra of 10^6 galaxies and 10^5 QSOs. As opposed to 2dFGRS, which can be considered to be its final state, SDSS will be running for several more years.

Reading material:

M. Colless et al. "The 2dFGRS Galaxy Redshift Survey: Spectra and redshifts" (astro-ph/0106498)

D. G. York et al. "The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary" (2000, AJ, 120, 1579)

Link to SDSS publications

Link to 2dFGRS publications


*5. October 17th, 2001

"Redshift surveys past, present and future - part III" - Craig Heinke

Abstract:

I will discuss three redshift surveys that have not yet begun to take spectra, but promise to take cosmology beyond Sloan. The MMT/Hectospec combination will be very fast and effective in the range 0.1 I will talk about the questions these surveys will try to answer, what is necessary to make an attempt to answer them, and the technical details of each survey, closing with some comparisons of the surveys.

Reading material:

M. Davis and J. A. Newman "Mining the Sky with Redshift Surveys" (astro-ph/0104418)

O. Le Fevre et al. "The VIRMOS-VLT Deep Survey" (astro-ph/0101034)


*6. October 24th, 2001 (in Classroom A)

"Galaxy luminosity functions" - Mark A. Hartman

Abstract:

One of the fundamental measurements that can be made with the data from a redshift survey is a determination of the galaxy luminosity function. I will review the importance of this measurement and two methods of determining the luminosity function: the parametric method of Sandage, Tammann and Yahil, and the nonparametric stepwise maximum-likelihood (SWML) method due to Efstathiou. The first involves an overall fit of the data obtained to an assumed Schechter function form of the luminosity function, while the second involves binning the data to obtain an estimate of the luminosity function in small steps of magnitude with no a priori assumption of its form. Additionally, I discuss the implications of the measurement, current values of the parameters involved, and the issues associated with luminosity functions of galaxy samples with different morphologies and other traits.

Reading material:

H. Lin et al. "The Luminosity Function of Galaxies in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey" (1996, ApJ, 464, 60)

B. Binggeli et al. "The luminosity function of galaxies" (1988, ARA\&A, 26, 509)

G. Efstathiou et al. "Analysis of a complete galaxy redshift survey. II - The field-galaxy luminosity function" (1988, MNRAS, 232, 431)

A. Sandage et al. "The velocity field of bright nearby galaxies. I - The variation of mean absolute magnitude with redshift for galaxies in a magnitude-limited sample" (1979, ApJ, 232, 352)


*7. October 31st, 2001

"Galaxy power spectrum" - Scott Schnee

Abstract:

Although the overall properties of the universe are close to being homogeneous, redshift surveys have revealed structures exceeding the size of 100 Mpc. The existence of these structures tells us about the initial conditions of the big bang and the cosmological parameters that describe the universe. One way to quantify the amount and scale of the inhomogeneities is the power spectrum. I will discuss the basic theory behind the power spectrum, the complexities in actually measuring it, and some recent results.

Reading material:

B. A. Allgood et al. "The Three-Dimensional Power Spectrum Measured from 2MASS" (astro-ph/0109403)

W. J. Percival et al. "The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The power spectrum and the matter content of the universe" (astro-ph/0105252)

M. Tegmark et al. "Measuring the Galaxy Power Spectrum with Future Redshift Surveys" (1998, ApJ, 499, 555)


*8. November 7th, 2001

"Redshift space distortions" - Steven Furlanetto

Abstract:

The mapping between our distance measurements (via redshifts) and the true distance is not perfect because each galaxy has its own peculiar velocity. However, this imperfect transformation can be turned to our advantage because the peculiar velocities are primarily caused by large-scale coherent infall into matter overdensities. I will review the theory of linear redshift space distortions and explain how they allow one to measure a particular function of the bias parameter of galaxies and the cosmological parameters. I will also review recent measurements of redshift space distortions, focusing on those from the IRAS PSCz and 2dF redshift surveys.

Reading material:

J. A. Peacock et al. "A measurement of the cosmological mass density from clustering in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey" (2001, Nature, 410, 169)

A. J. S. Hamilton et al. "Linear redshift distortions and power in the IRAS Point Source Catalog Redshift Survey" (2000, MNRAS, 317, L23)

A.J.S. Hamilton "Linear Redshift Distortions: A Review" (astro-ph/9708102)

N. Kaiser "Clustering in real space and in redshift space" (1987, MNRAS, 227, 1)


*9. November 14th, 2001

"Finding clusters and superclusters of galaxies" - Daniel Marrone

Abstract:

Galaxy clusters are powerful cosmological tools. They can be used to examine large scale structure and to determine the amount of dark matter on Mpc scales. Their abundance and redshift distribution can be used to determine cosmological parameters and constrain the nature of dark energy. These applications require large catalogues of galaxy clusters with well understood biases and selection effects and this has led to the development of a variety of methods of cluster identification. I will examine the prominent cluster identification methods and discuss their application to surveys with spectroscopic redshifts, photometric redshifts, or no redshift information at all. I will also summarize the performance of each method when applied to real and/or simulated data.

Reading material:

R. Kim et al. "Detecting Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey I : Monte Carlo Comparison of Cluster Detection Algorithms" (astro-ph/0110259)

M. White and C. S. Kochanek "Completeness in Photometric and Spectroscopic Searches for Clusters" (astro-ph/0110307)

J. Kepner et al. "An Automated Cluster Finder: The Adaptive Matched Filter" (1999, ApJ, 517, 78)

D. Zaritsky et al. "Distant Galaxy Clusters Identified from Optical Background Fluctuations" (1997, ApJ, 480, L91)


*10. November 21st, 2001

"Galaxy biasing" - Brant E. Robertson

Abstract:

Determining the relation between the observed galaxy distribution and the underlying mass distribution remains an unsolved problem. Redshift surveys can contribute to a solution of this problem through observational measures of the galaxy-galaxy correlation function and redshift space distortions. In this discussion I review the concept of galaxy bias, considering both linear and nonlinear bias. I will discuss theoretically and observationally oriented treatments of bias and the effectiveness of observations from current redshift surveys to measure galaxy bias.

Reading material:

Brant's talk

P. Coles "Large-Scale Structure, Theory and Statistics" (astro-ph/0103017)

J. A. Peacocket al. "A measurement of the cosmological mass density from clustering in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey" (2001, Nature, 410, 169)

Y. Sigad et al. "Measuring the Nonlinear Biasing Function from a Galaxy Redshift Survey" (2000, ApJ, 540, 62)


*11. November 28th, 2001

"Serendipitous science from redshift surveys" - Maryam Modjaz

Abstract:

Extensive redshift surveys inevitably capture astronomical objects besides their targets of interest. I will review three instances in which the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) has yielded serendipitous science, spanning a wide range of redshifts: Solar System objects, Galactic halo objects and high-redshift quasars. For each, I will describe the methods used to obtain and select data and indicate the tests performed. I will present the importance of the findings while emphasizing the special features of SDSS that made these findings possible.

Reading material:

H. J. Newberg et al. "The Ghost of Sagittarius and Lumps in the Halo of the Milky Way" (astro-ph/0111095)

R. H. Becker et al. "Evidence for Reionization at z ~ 6: Detection of a Gunn-Peterson Trough in a z=6.28 Quasar" (astro-ph/0108097)

Z. Ivezic et al. "Solar System Objects Observed in the SDSS Commissioning Data" (astro-ph/0105511)


*12. December 5th, 2001

"Joint parameter estimation from Redshift Surveys, SNe and CMB experiments" - Alexia E. Schulz

Abstract:

Many recent studies suggest that redshift surveys may become a valuable tool for studying the cosmological parameters. Particular attention has been given to the question of whether or not redshift surveys could help cosmologists probe the nature of the dark energy now believed to dominate the energy density in the universe. I will begin with a thorough discussion of the statistical tools often used in these analyses, and discuss how to combine the results of different experiments to strengthen the constraints. I will briefly survey the predictions for the constraints from several upcoming cosmological observations, focusing on the dark energy results. I will conclude by discussing strategies for designing redshift surveys that will optimize the constraints when the results are combined with other experiments.

Reading material:

T. Matsubara, A. S. Szalay "Constraining the Cosmological Constant from Large-Scale Redshift-Space Clustering" (2001, ApJ, 556, L67)

Z. Haiman et al. "Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from Future Galaxy Cluster Surveys" (2001, ApJ, 553, 545)

D. J. Eisenstein et al. "Cosmic Cosmic Complementarity: Joint Parameter Estimation from Cosmic Microwave Background Experiments and Redshift Surveys" (1999, ApJ, 518, 2)


*13. December 12th, 2001

"Hubble Deep Fields" - Paul T. Kondratko

Abstract:

Reading material:


Questions or Comments? Send an e-mail to kstanek@cfa.harvard.edu.
This page was last updated on December 4th, 2001.