Current Sensitivity Estimates for M4


Message from Dan Clemens Received on March 1, 1997:

	I redesigned M4 for a 40 cm aperture, and did a full ray trace
to establish the size of the secondary and to improve the optical quality
of the instrument.

  Using the new optical components, and selecting a working 
temperature of 5.6 K (the COBE and SIRTF optics temperatures), I have
computed a new sensitivity table, for the 95um center wavelength,
with bandwidth of 30um:

  The S/N = 600 criterion for EACH pixel in EACH of the two arrays
will yield a polarization percentage uncertainty of 0.236%. This,
when combined with a polarization of 1% will yield a position angle
uncertainty of 6.4 degrees. Thus, if we require position angle
uncertainties under 10 degrees for 1% polarized directions (in 
order to make sensible magnetic field maps), we must achieve 
a photometric S/N > 600.

  Again, I used IRSKY to identify the Zodiacal and Galactic and
Target surface brightnesses:


Region   Gal.Long.  Gal.Lat.  Zodi  Gal  NESB  Target  Time to 
Name      [deg.]     [deg.]   ======[MJy/sr]=========  S/N=600
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gal.Ctr.    0         0       14  20000  9.6   20000    0.08s
            3         0       15   2000  3.0    2000    0.8
	    3	    1.5	      15    330  1.3     330    5.3
            3       3.5       15    113  0.77    113   17.
            3       5.0       15     67  0.62     67   31.
Gal.Plane  25         0       10   2400  3.3    2400    0.7
           25       1.5       10    330  1.3     330    5.2
	   25       3.5       10    110  0.74    110   16.
           25       5.0        9     78  0.64     78   24.
           48         0        6    440  1.4     440    3.6
           48       1.5        6    123  0.77    123   14.
	   48       3.5        6     50  0.51     50   38.
           48       5.0        6     35  0.44     35   57.

rho-Oph 
 star forming core            15     40  0.50 300-2400  < 0.01
 envelope around core         15     40  0.50    50    36.
 dark filaments               15     40  0.50  5-80    14-3600s

Ursa Major / NCP
 Carl's Spider (core)        4.6    0.2  0.16     8   137. (24" pixels)
   "      "  (filaments)     4.6    0.2  0.16   1-3  400-3500s (60" pixels)

M31 (GI Project)  
 Core		             6.4    3.7  0.22    40    11. (24" pixels)
 Spiral Arms                 6.4    3.7  0.22  1-14  5h - 2m (24" pixels)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Array parameters:
	PSF size at 95um is 60"
	Pixel sampling set to 24"
	Array sizes of 32x32 = 768x768" = 12.8 x 12.8' = 0.0455 square deg.

"Normal" Observing mode:
	Two "orientations" (0 degrees, 45 degrees)
	2x2 half-array dithering (6.4 arcmin steps in each cardinal
			direction)
	
Milky Way Mapping:
	1000 square degrees (100 l x 10 b)
	Non-overlapped Array Footprints = 22,000
	Overlapped Array Footprints = 88,000
	Independent Pixels = 22 million (24")
	Independent PSFs = 4 million (60")

	Dwell Time per Footprint = 10 seconds
		3 second slew and settle, 7 seconds integration time
	Total Integration time per pixel per orientation = 7 x 4 = 28 sec.

	Total Time to complete Milky Way Map = 20.5 days 
	Time Including Contingency, Overheads, Data loss = 28 days
	
	Zone	Lowest S/N per 24" pixel  	Lowest S/N per 60"
       ------------------------------------------------------------
           b<1.5	850				>2000
       1.5<b<3.5  	520				1300
       3.5<b<5.0	420				1000

	Summary: We can certainly perform our Milky Way map to +/-5
		 degrees of latitude in 4 weeks. Inside of about 2 degrees,
		 we always have S/N >600 for 24" pixels. Inside of 5 degrees,
		 we always have S/N > 600 for 60" pixels.

	Options: If our mapping efficiency stays high, we might consider
		 extending the latitude range even more (to say +/- 7 deg.)
		 This may be possible to do "on the fly" during the mission.

Dark Cloud / Star Formation Regions
	I'll do the detailed calculations next week.

Ursa Major / Carl-the-spider
	The core of the spider has a surface brightness of 8 MJy/sr,
	and the legs range in brightness from 1 to 3 MJy/sr (the 3
	is for some of the brighter knots in the filaments).

	The core can easily be mapped and restored onto 24" pixels.

	The filaments are harder, but not impossible. 
	If we insist on S/N > 600 for 60" pixels for the 1 MJy/sr 
	non-bright filament portions, then we need 2x2 (dithered) 
	integrations of 840s per footprint.

	Thus, for 2 weeks, to the 1 MJy/sr faintness level, we can map
	6.4 square degrees (say, one 2.5 x 2.5 degree zone).

	Instead, if we merely want to trace the magnetic field from
	one filament knot to the next, the flux floor is 3 MJy/sr
	and a total of 57 square degree can be mapped (one 7.5 x 7.5 
	degree zone).

	I'd like Carl and Alyssa to think this one over. Do we need
	to see all parts of the filaments? If so, the area surveyed
	will be small.

M31
	OK, I decided to see what a "typical" GI program would look
	like. I poked at M31 with IRSKY at 100um to get the surface
	brightnesses reported above.

	The rough area is 2 square degrees (2 x 1 degrees), and if
	we devote 24 hours to M31, we can perform 2x2 dithering in
	two orientations with a total of 350 pointings. 

	The total integration time per pixel per orientation is then
	16 minutes. The sensitivity is 0.22 MJy/sr, so for 24" pixels,
	we meet the S/N>600 criterion for all points brighter than
	4.3 MJy/sr. For 60" pixels, this drops to 1.7 MJy/sr.

	The M31 core easily meets the 24" pixel value, and the spiral
	arms range up to 14 MJy/sr, so we will either map magnetic
	fields for much of the spiral arms, to 24", or essentially
	all of the spiral arms to 60". 

	Either way, this M31 map will be spectacular. At 24", there
	will be some 45,000 independent pixels - or 7,200 at 60".

dc
Back to M4 Homepage